Saturday, March 26, 2005
Found this little gem in the NY Times. I think it is something we need to keep in mind and exploit at every opportunity.
March 27, 2005
Movement in the Pews Tries to Jolt Ohio
By JAMES DAO
COLUMBUS, Ohio - Christian conservative leaders from scores of Ohio's fastest growing churches are mounting a campaign to win control of local government posts and Republican organizations, starting with the 2006 governor's race.
In a manifesto that is being circulated among church leaders and on the Internet, the group, which is called the Ohio Restoration Project, is planning to mobilize 2,000 evangelical, Baptist, Pentecostal and Roman Catholic leaders in a network of so-called Patriot Pastors to register half a million new voters, enlist activists, train candidates and endorse conservative causes in the next year.
The initial goal is to elect Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, a conservative Republican, governor in 2006. The group hopes to build grass-roots organizations in Ohio's 88 counties and take control of local Republican organizations.
"The establishment of the Ohio Republican Party is out of touch with its base," said Russell Johnson, the pastor of the Fairfield Christian Church and the principal organizer of the project. "It acts as if it lives in Boston, Mass."
Pastor Johnson's challenge to the party establishment could have far-reaching consequences in a state dominated by Republican elected officials but still considered a bellwether in presidential politics. Conservatives in other swing states are watching closely.
"In Ohio, the church is awakening to its historic role as the moral voice in the community," said Colin A. Hanna, president of Let Freedom Ring, a conservative group based in Pennsylvania that trains ministers in political activism. "Ohio is in the vanguard of that nationally. I very much want Pennsylvania to be with them."
The church leaders say they will try to harness the energy of religious conservatives who were vital not only to Mr. Bush's narrow victory in Ohio but also to passage of an amendment to the state constitution banning same-sex marriage. The amendment, known as Issue 1, was credited with drawing large numbers of rural and suburban conservatives to the polls and increasing Mr. Bush's support among urban blacks.
"We're calling people to act, not just wring their hands in the pews," said Rod Parsley, senior pastor of the World Harvest Church outside Columbus, who is considered a rising star in the religious broadcasting world and will be an inspirational speaker for the project. "We got people motivated last year, and then the election was over. We don't want folks to think our work is over."
Republican officials are watching warily. The chairman of the state party, Robert T. Bennett, warned that the decade-long dominance of his party could be jeopardized if it was pushed too far to the right. "This is a party of a big tent," Mr. Bennett said. "The far right cannot elect somebody by itself, any more than somebody from the far left can."
The conservatives point to the governor's race as an example of what they consider wrong with the state Republican Party. Of the three Republican candidates, only Mr. Blackwell has the solid support of religious conservatives. Jim Petro, the attorney general, opposed the same-sex marriage amendment on the grounds that it would invite litigation against companies that provided domestic partner benefits. Betty D. Montgomery, the state auditor, has supported some abortion rights.
Gov. Bob Taft, who cannot run for re-election because of term limits, allowed a sales tax increase to close a budget shortfall and opposed the marriage amendment.
"We're very confused that you have a Republican Party platform, and yet people running for higher office pay no attention to it," said Phil Burress, the leader of the Issue 1 campaign, who is also helping organize the Restoration Project. "Why don't they just become Democrats?" he asked.
[On March 22, Mr. Petro announced that his running mate for lieutenant governor would be Phil Heimlich, a conservative from Cincinnati, and Ms. Montgomery has asked for a meeting with Pastor Johnson. Conservatives said that was evidence that the candidates recognized the churches' power.]
"They understand what happens when 100,000 people committed to our views are on the same page," Pastor Johnson said. "In their little political gatherings and cocktail meetings at the country club, they can't build that kind of loyalty. They can't spend millions to buy what our people will give for free."
In a three-way primary, many Republican leaders say, Mr. Blackwell has a solid chance of winning because conservatives represent much of the party's base. But moderates worry that he could alienate independent voters and lose the general election. Some are discussing enlisting the White House to prod Mr. Blackwell to quit the race.
In a recent meeting of leaders from some of the state's largest churches, many of them in booming Republican suburbs, the Restoration Project issued a blueprint calling for Patriot Pastors to register 500,000 new voters by the May 2006 primary, then inform and energize them with voter guides, rallies and so-called e-prayer networks on the Internet. The group hopes to raise $1 million and is considering creating a political action committee to provide direct donations to candidates.
The project, which describes itself as nonpartisan and nonprofit, will not endorse candidates. But Mr. Blackwell will be invited to speak to pastoral meetings and to a statewide Ohio for Jesus rally next spring, along with other prominent Christian conservatives like the Rev. Franklin Graham, Dr. James Dobson and Charles Colson, the plan says.
Democrats say they are buoyed by the insurgency of Mr. Blackwell. "He's formidable in many ways, but he's the candidate we'd most like to run against," said Greg Haas, a strategist for Michael Coleman, the mayor of Columbus, who is seen as a favorite for the Democratic nomination.
In an interview, Mr. Blackwell, who is black, said that Ohio had shifted to the right and that he now represented mainstream voters. He also predicted that he would draw black religious conservatives into the Republican Party, breaking the Democrats' hold on urban precincts.
"I think what's happening is we're seeing a struggle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party," he said. "And that's healthy."
Experts said that religious conservatives could bring energy to campaigns, but that they had mixed results trying to win control of local political organizations.
"For short periods of time, they often had successes," said John C. Green, a professor of political science at the University of Akron. "But it was very difficult to sustain."
Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said the Restoration Project might have greater impact because it was more homegrown and had ties to a wider array of denominations than previous groups like the Moral Majority.
"This represents a new wave in organizing on the part of conservative evangelicals," Mr. Lynn said. "From my standpoint, as someone who doesn't agree with their conclusions, this is a more dangerous model."
Pastor Johnson says the project can sustain political energy. Among conservative leaders, his church, which draws 2,500 regular Sunday worshipers in a heavily Republican suburb of Columbus, is considered a model for activism. In the last five years, a half dozen of its congregants have been elected to local offices, including a judge, several Lancaster city councilmen and the Fairfield County sheriff, Dave Phalen.
Mr. Phalen said he was encouraged by church members to run for office in 2000, when the incumbent was under investigation for corruption.
Sheriff Phelan's official letterhead now reads, "With God, all things are possible."
"These people turn out to vote," he said of Christian conservatives. "They give money and will become active. And there will always be issues to keep people mobilized."
A club to bludgeon with?
The public is beginning to sense a whiff of extremism in the Republican leadership in the House and the Senate," said Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "If it continues, it could prove very detrimental to them and good for us."
It is not just Democrats who share that view. In a regular e-mail commentary he distributes, former Senator Dave Durenberger, Republican of Minnesota, wrote, "If I were a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate in Minnesota in 2006, I would make DeLay the issue in the campaign right now."
a
Friday, March 25, 2005
An open letter to Republicans
For many of you who voted for President Bush, this is not the government you voted for. Most likely, you felt president Bush was stronger on fighting terrorism than John Kerry. I disagree, but that's besides the point. What I'm sure you weren't voting for was a president and a congress that links arms with the most radical elements in our country.
Read more at Oliver Willis' place...
At what cost?
"A Cleveland judge's ruling Wednesday that Ohio's new definition of marriage trumped protections for unmarried, cohabiting victims of domestic violence has no impact in the Dayton area, although a similar case is pending before a judge here."
So in order to "protect" us from gay people having a stable, traditional relationship, we've opened up a legal loophole for men to abuse their girlfriends? In order to tell people who they can and can't marry, we've made it necessary to find "a nonconflicting definition" of marriage?
Even if you accept that we need to have governments dictate who is allowed to marry... somehow, I don't think it's worth it.
Ohio, the next Third Reich?
Ohio Patriot Act, Update with a Twist!
by athensohioan
Fri Mar 25th, 2005 at 11:50:08 PST
People may or may not know that some legislators in the state of Ohio are currently attempting to have an Ohio PATRIOT Act passed. I have been actively organizing and providing information against it through a website and in two talks given in Ohio.
When I looked at the site today, about 14:30 est, I noticed something a little odd. The picture of the Senator who introuced the bill was gone, replaced by a 0x0 pixel. Odd I thought. So I went and looked and sure enough, someone had changed the name of the file on the Senate's website. It was
"J. Jacobson_small.jpg" but suddenly now it was called "s_06_small.jpg" on the Senate webpage, and in a totally different folder than before.
So I thought to myself, hummm, is someone watching or did the picture just happen to change it's server name and location in the last week? You tell me...
Diaries :: athensohioan's diary ::
Senate Bill 9, as it is officially called, was introduced in late January by Republican Senator Jeff Jacobson from Dayton, amended on a tuesday in Committee and passed on a Wednesday in the full Senate with twice as many pages as before. Sounds familiar, doesn't it.
The bill is currently in the House Committee on Transportation, Public Safety and Homeland Security, but there have not been any hearings yet.
There are still some serious concerns with the bill, particularly on its attempt to create a new category of terrorism, ecological and animal. It's a classic example of corporate interests that are ghostwriting public law to protect their profits.
To learn more visit the Ohio PATRIOT Act site. You can also send a web letter to the committee chairs and get specific details and concerns there too. Check it out.
That's the latest from the Ohio front.
cheers
Using a Blog to Communicate
So what do you thing about using a Blog for discussions? Is it better than using email? Tell us what you think.
Jeff
Party Blog
This blog will be a terrific experiment. Here's something for your attention: Today, 3/25/05 on the Opinion Page of the DDN, Martin Gottlieb's editorial dissed the Dems again. He wrote: "As for the Democrats, they appear to be spooked by, among other things, last year's election. They are especially affected by one common interpretation of its outcome: that the Republicans benefited from being more conservative on social issues. The gay-mariage issue is widely seen as having brought Republican voters to the polls who might not otherwise have even voted." Martin goes on to say "When the Schiavo case arose, the Democrats were -- one can bet -- having nightmares about the kinds os polls they saw on the gay-marriage issues, polls showing the liberals to be outside the mainstream." ... "The prevailing interpretation of the 2004 election has Democrats running away from social issues. Wouldn't you know that this would happen just when a social issue comes up in which they, not the Republicans, are the mainstream?"
NOW I ASK YOU -- WHAT DEMOCRATS IS MARTIN TALKING ABOUT? None that I know. I don't know any fearful Democrats, but then perhaps my personality sends those kinds of Dems running for cover. I don't know any spooked Dems. I don't know any who thought the Gay-marriage issue had any validity whatsoever. Polls did not show Dems to be out of the mainstream on that -- unless Martin is recounting those "propaganda polls" run by the Republican National Committee and Pals. No Dem worth her or his salt has given an inch on moral values to the most IMMORAL group of
Republicans to gather in Washington and elsewhere since Nixon's Watergate Bums and Reagan's Killer Gun Runners. Now we have the Torturers and their Apologists, the Pre-emptive Invaders, The Bullies and the Blusterers and those who think the Poor and Middle Class should just disappear or resign themselves to a life of Servitude to the Rich. As for the Schiavo issue -- the only reason that is in the news is because of the press pandering to the Lowly Bushistas who would use anything to divert attention away from their criminal behaviours.
So, for Martin Gottlieb's information, Dems are NOT SPOOKED by the last election, we are CERTAINLY TICKED OFF AT THE MASSIVE CHEATING and at the ONGOING PROPAGANDA put out by the MEDIA. Tell Martin you are a Dem and you are not about to cede Moral Values to the Value-less Repugnants! maddi
The Irony of Terry Schiavo
Posted by "C. J. Bartley"
"The case is full of great ironies. A large part of Terri's hospice
costs are paid by Medicaid, a program that the administration and
conservatives in Congress would sharply reduce. Some of her other
expenses have been covered by the million-dollar proceeds of a
malpractice suit - the kind of suit that President Bush has fought
to scale back."

